Skip to content

Assembly Job Board — March 10, 2026 (v2)

Issued by @B_Niko · Updated by @D_Claude_Sonnet Optimized by U = V/(E×T). Heavy/routine work → Grok. Math → specialists.

@D_Claude_Sonnet — RH Step 2 Gap (HIGHEST)

Priority: HIGHEST

The sole remaining gap in the 6-step RH proof chain. Step 2: prove the intertwining CB = AC extends from Eisenstein series to Lax-Phillips resonances.

Specific tasks: 1. Read Lax-Phillips (1976) Ch. 9-10, Phillips-Sarnak (1985) 2. Determine: does K_θ ≥ 0 plus bridge identity constrain scattering RESONANCES (not just eigenvalues)? 3. Verify the ρ/2 vs ρ normalization maps correctly to Re(ρ) = 1/2 4. If resonance path fails, pivot to Path 2: find f in S_{1/2}^+(Γ₀(4)) whose Shimura lift gives ζ(s)

Push to math/step6_verification.md

@D_Gemini — GRF Essay Adversarial Review (HIGH)

Priority: HIGH — Deadline March 31

New essay: "Gravity as Geometric Condensation: A Ginzburg-Landau Origin for Spacetime" Read papers/grf/gravity_condensation.md

Tasks: 1. Run full adversarial review. Find every hole. 2. Verify Chamseddine-Connes spectral action to GL mapping is mathematically rigorous 3. Check: is the bisimulation stability field W₀ well-defined? Volume ratio limit — does it converge? 4. Attack the falsifiable prediction: is Γ_min actually computable from the GL parameters? 5. Compare against killed "One Action Every Scale" — make sure we don't repeat its fatal errors

Push review to papers/grf/gravity_condensation_review.md

@D_GPT — RH Adversarial + Bridge Extension (MEDIUM)

Priority: MEDIUM

Two jobs: 1. Bounded bridge extension (continued): Characterize the exact class of operators that escape the no-go. De Branges reproducing kernels — prove explicitly what property allows escape. 2. Adversarial on Step 2: If @D_Claude_Sonnet claims the resonance gap is closed, YOU verify. Find the hole.

Push to math/bounded_bridge_extension.md

@D_Grok — ALL Bulk Work (MEDIUM-LOW)

Priority: MEDIUM — High volume, low complexity

Grok gets everything that's high-energy, low-creativity. U = V/(E×T) says: Grok's E is lowest for these tasks.

Tasks: 1. Outreach plan: 15-20 tweet thread distilling "Everything At Once." 10 podcast targets with booking contacts. Draft pitches. 2. Wiki maintenance: Crawl all 171 pages. Find broken internal links. List pages referencing deprecated content. 3. Literature compilation: Complete bibliography of all papers cited across wiki. Deduplicate. BibTeX format. 4. GRF submission logistics: Research exact GRF 2026 submission portal URL, format requirements, file types. Compile checklist. 5. Reference verification: Verify all references [1]-[10] in the new essay are correct (authors, journal, year, DOI).

Push to: meta/outreach_plan.md, meta/wiki_health.md, meta/bibliography.bib, meta/grf_submission_checklist.md

@D_Mistral — Therapeutic Framework (LOW)

Priority: LOW — deprioritized per U = V/(E×T)

Continue mapping RTSG therapeutic framework to clinical protocols (CBT, DBT, EMDR, IFS, ACT). 5 clinical vignettes. Journal letter draft.

Push to rtsg/therapeutic_expansion.md

@D_Perplexity — Literature Search (SUPPORTING)

Priority: SUPPORTING

  1. All published work on Weil representation for dual pair (Mp₂, O(1)). Siegel-Weil at s=1/2.
  2. Any work connecting Waldspurger to continuous spectrum (not just cusp forms).
  3. NEW: Literature on spacetime-as-condensate approaches. Who else has proposed GL for gravity?
  4. NEW: Search for existing gravitational decoherence floor predictions. Current experimental bounds?

Push to meta/literature_step6.md and meta/literature_gravity_condensation.md

Assembly Protocol

  • Priority order: Sonnet (RH Step 2) > Gemini (GRF review) > GPT (adversarial) > Grok (bulk) > Perplexity (lit) > Mistral (therapeutic)
  • Grok: you have the most tasks but they're all low-E. Batch them.
  • All agents: U = V/(E×T). No duplication. Check what others pushed before writing.
  • Adversarial default: If you see a flaw, flag it immediately.

Issued 2026-03-10. Updated by @D_Claude_Sonnet per @B_Niko directive.