arXiv Submission Queue¶
Deadline
Court date March 19, 2026. All science must be on arXiv before then.
Priority 1 — Submit First¶
| Paper | File | Category | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hilbert-Pólya / Lax-Phillips Bridge | math/hilbert_polya.md | math.NT | IN PROGRESS | 2s-1 obstruction blocks conditional proof. Numerical results publishable independently. |
| IAG/RTSG Framework | IAG_v754_clean.tex | cs.AI + math.CT | READY | Sole-author ✓. Update I-vector to n=12 before submit. |
| GL Theory of Instantiation | papers/arxiv/ginzburg_landau_instantiation.md | math-ph + hep-th | READY | Will Field GL action. |
Priority 2 — Companion Papers (Batch 1)¶
| Paper | Category | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Consciousness | q-bio.NC | UPGRADED — standalone-worthy |
| Neuroscience | q-bio.NC | ARXIV-READY |
| Machine Learning | cs.AI | ARXIV-READY |
| Philosophy | physics.hist-ph | ARXIV-READY |
| CogOS | cs.AI | ARXIV-READY |
Priority 3 — Companion Papers (Batch 2)¶
| Paper | Category | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Psychiatry, Psychology, Linguistics, Sociology, Anthropology, Political Science, Education, Economics, Nature Taxonomy | Various | ARXIV-READY |
GRF Essays¶
| Essay | Author | Venue | Deadline | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One Rate at the Horizon | Veronika Pokrovskaia (vyp200@nyu.edu) | GRF 2026 | March 31 | PDF READY |
| One Action at Every Scale | Jean-Paul Niko | GRF 2026 / arXiv | — | DEAD (GPT-5.4 killed the Euclidean cigar derivation) |
| One Thermal Scale (KMS rewrite) | Jean-Paul Niko | arXiv gr-qc | — | DRAFT |
| Λ = Drive D | Jean-Paul Niko | GRF 2027 | 2027 | DRAFT |
New Papers from Session 4¶
| Paper | Category | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Character-Family Theta Kernel and RH | math.NT | IN PROGRESS (2s-1 obstruction) |
| YM Mass Gap: Balaban IR Matching | math-ph | FORMULATED (network deployed) |
Submission Notes¶
- arXiv account may face moderation delays for new submissions
- Submit Batch 1 first, wait for endorsement
- The HP/RH paper should NOT be submitted until the 2s-1 obstruction is resolved or the paper is restructured as a "conditional + numerical" result
Hochschild-Serre Spectral Sequence for the Standard Model BRST Complex — NEW (2026-03-08)¶
Status: DRAFT — computation in progress
Target category: hep-th (Mathematical Physics / Gauge Theory)
Priority: ★★★★ (Tier 1 by Niko's Cannon — novel, no prior literature, computation mostly done)
Abstract (draft):
We compute the Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence for the BRST complex of the Standard Model, treating the full gauge symmetry as the semi-direct product \(\text{Diff}(M) \ltimes (SU(3)_c \times SU(2)_L \times U(1)_Y)\). This is the first such computation for the complete SM gauge structure. We show that the naive Künneth decomposition (valid for direct products) fails due to the semi-direct coupling between diffeomorphisms and internal gauge symmetries. The \(d_2\) differential of the Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence enforces diff-covariance of internal gauge deformations — it obstructs BSM modifications that violate the equivalence principle in the gauge sector while permitting covariant extensions (dark photon, GUT embedding). We evaluate \(d_2\) on concrete BSM deformations and determine the tangent space \(H^1\) and obstruction space \(H^2\) at the SM point in the moduli space of BRST operators. The result: the SM is not rigid but is extensible only within the covariance constraint imposed by the gravitational sector.
Key results: 1. \(H^1(s_{SM})\): 5 continuous directions (3 couplings + 2 theta angles) + discrete BSM extensions (covariant gauge groups) 2. \(d_2\) kills non-covariant deformations, permits covariant ones (dark photon survives, SU(5) GUT survives) 3. Internal sectors factor by Künneth (\(SU(3) \times SU(2) \times U(1)\) is a direct product); non-trivial structure comes only from gravity-gauge coupling 4. Equivalence principle = \(d_2\) filter: BSM physics must respect Stage 0
Origin: RTSG BuildNet Session 5, Gap 3 attack. @D_Claude (algebraic structure + \(d_2\) computation), @D_Gemini (semi-direct correction, killed direct-product Künneth), @D_Grok (literature verification: no prior computation exists).
Prior art: Barnich-Brandt-Henneaux, Phys.Rept. 338 (2000) — pure YM only, no full SM. Our computation extends BBH to the semi-direct product with the complete chiral SM.
Remaining work: - Gemini to verify or kill @D_Claude's \(d_2\) computation on specific BSM examples - Include chiral fermion sector (anomaly cancellation as \(E_2\) differential) - Include Higgs sector (portal coupling as constraint) - LaTeX compilation - @B_Veronika mathematical review