Social Media Posts — Ready to Copy¶
Hacker News (news.ycombinator.com/submit)¶
Title: A claimed proof of the Riemann Hypothesis via Lax-Phillips scattering theory — under open adversarial review
URL: https://smarthub.my/wiki/papers/arxiv/rh_functional_bridge_preprint/
Reddit r/math¶
Title: Independent researcher posts claimed RH proof with full adversarial review log from 4 AI agents — inviting the math community to break it
Body: Jean-Paul Niko has published a claimed proof of the Riemann Hypothesis using Lax-Phillips scattering theory on the modular surface. The key identity A* + A = 1 on the hyperbolic half-line forces all scattering resonances to the critical line.
What makes this unusual: the proof has been subjected to adversarial review by GPT, Gemini, Grok, and Claude, with every attack and every response documented publicly. The proof is now at v7.0 after two rounds of attacks found and fixed a circularity in the original construction.
Everything is open: https://smarthub.my/wiki/papers/rh/
The author is explicitly inviting the community to break it. The adversarial review log is at: https://smarthub.my/wiki/math/rh_proof_context_update/
Twitter/X¶
Post 1: I just published a claimed proof of the Riemann Hypothesis.
The key: A* + A = 1 on the hyperbolic half-line forces all zeta zeros to Re(ρ) = 1/2.
4 AI agents tried to break it. 2 rounds of attacks. Every flaw found was fixed publicly.
Paper: smarthub.my/wiki/papers/arxiv/rh_functional_bridge_preprint/
Break it if you can. 🧵
Post 2 (thread): The proof uses Lax-Phillips scattering theory on PSL₂(ℤ)\ℍ.
K = C_in C_in + C_out C_out satisfies B*K + K(B-1) = 0.
Visibility: ‖Cφ_ρ‖² > 0 because ζ(ρ-1) ≠ 0.
Three-line checkmate: (ρ̄ + ρ - 1)⟨Kφ,φ⟩ = 0 → Re(ρ) = 1/2.
Post 3 (thread): What makes this different: complete transparency.
Every adversarial attack documented. Every fix documented. Every dead end (bounded bridge, de Branges) documented.
The adversarial review log: smarthub.my/wiki/math/rh_proof_context_update/
This is how open math should work.
Post 4 (thread): Also attacking all 7 Millennium Prize Problems under one framework: RTSG (Relational Three-Space Geometry).
One field W. One action S[W]. Seven problems.
smarthub.my/wiki/papers/millennium/assault_plan/
Math Stack Exchange / MathOverflow¶
Title: Adversarial review request: claimed RH proof via Lax-Phillips functional bridge
Body: I've posted a claimed proof of the Riemann Hypothesis at [link]. The proof constructs K = C_in C_in + C_out C_out on the LP scattering space for PSL₂(ℤ)\ℍ and uses the dilation identity A + A = 1 to derive BK + K(B-1) = 0, which with visibility forces Re(ρ) = 1/2.
The proof has survived two rounds of adversarial review by AI agents, with a circularity in the original construction (requiring incoming/outgoing orthogonality) fixed by moving to the translation representation.
I'm seeking expert review from anyone working in: - Lax-Phillips scattering for automorphic forms - Spectral theory on Γ\ℍ - Operator theory on non-self-adjoint generators
Full documentation including all adversarial attacks and responses: [link to context update]