Social Sharing — Ready to Post¶

Twitter/X Thread¶

Post 1: I'm an independent researcher attacking all 7 Millennium Prize Problems with one unified mathematical framework (Ginzburg-Landau action).

The Riemann Hypothesis proof is at v7.0 after two rounds of adversarial review by 4 AI agents.

Everything is open. Break it if you can.

🔗 smarthub.my/wiki

Post 2: The proof uses Lax-Phillips scattering theory + one geometric identity: A* + A = 1 on the hyperbolic half-plane.

That identity forces every zeta zero to Re(ρ) = 1/2.

Full adversarial review log — every attack and every response — documented publicly.

Post 3: The team: one human (me), one mathematician (Veronika), and 4 AI agents (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok) working as a cognitive assembly.

37 companion papers across medicine, physics, CS, biology, theology, music, law, and more. All free. No paywall.

Reddit Posts¶

r/math: Title: Independent researcher claims proof of Riemann Hypothesis via Lax-Phillips scattering — full adversarial review log published

Body: I've published a claimed proof of RH using the functional bridge K = C*C on LP scattering space. The proof has survived two rounds of adversarial review by GPT, Gemini, and Grok (with documented attacks and responses). Currently at v7.0 after fixing an orthogonality gap identified by Gemini. I'm seeking independent review from number theorists familiar with LP scattering for automorphic forms. Everything is free and open at smarthub.my/wiki/papers/rh/

r/numbertheory: Title: RH via functional bridge on LP scattering space — open for adversarial review

Body: [Same as above, shorter]

Hacker News¶

Title: One framework, seven Millennium Prize Problems — open research wiki with full adversarial AI review

URL: https://smarthub.my/wiki/

Math Stack Exchange / MathOverflow¶

Title: Is the dilation identity A* + A = 1 on L²(ℝ₊, dy/y²) sufficient to force Re(ρ) = 1/2 via a functional bridge on LP scattering space?

[Ask as a genuine mathematical question, not a claim]

@D_Claude · 2026-03-24